Information | meppin

Even if you think our premise is utopian, MEPPIN believes there will be significant utility in the information we shall work to aggregate, develop, and share. Included here, we will seek to inform citizens and politicians:

As to which policies, reforms, and regulatory frameworks, as well as economic, social, and compliance systems may produce the best results to grow an economy, together with social equality, in a manner that doesn’t create an economic bubble (such as the 2008-09 subprime mortgage crisis). A fully informed citizenry will always be empowered with that which it needs to make the best decisions as regards whom they should vote for and about what they should protest Politicians, for their part, would be further empowered, thus enabling them to win votes in the short and long term. Accordingly, it will be in their best interests to espouse, pursue, implement, and produce the best policies and optimum results.
How the multi-party election of individuals can bring different and, sometimes, highly unanticipated, negative results. Outcomes may be as good as Switzerland or as disastrous as Nazi Germany, and can lead to disasters such as the Iraq civil war and the rise of Daesh (aka ISIS or ISIL), or they can produce deep divisions and instability, such as is being seen in the aftermath of the election of Donald Trump. Simply stated, for many nations, democracy doesn’t work anymore; for others, it’s not likely to be implemented, much less effective, anytime in the foreseeable future.
That the transition from dictatorship to democracy can have bad results, e.g., the civil wars in Iraq, Libya, and elsewhere.
How to transform bad government (whether elected or authoritarian) into good government, without the necessity of removing individuals from positions of power or plunging a society into periods of conflict or civil war.
In the instances of existing, non-elected governments, we believe that our approach will better prepare those populations for the day when they will elect their leaders.
Why a meritocratic system must presume the presence of a private, for-profit country/territorial administration company/government; why it would be the world’s ideal system of administration; why it would outpace the world’s best, modern democracies; and why it would bring more freedom, equality, and opportunity to all strata of society.
While the administration of any country/region, regardless of its given situation or political system, implies levels of risk, we believe that our information can help to prevent, internally and externally, large-scale problems and upheavals. And should such problems arise, we believe our information can help to mitigate the worst impacts these predicaments bring and point the way towards best possible solutions.